Page 482 of 529

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 04 May 2019 22:59
by tantalus
EdgeGladiator wrote:
03 May 2019 21:49
I don't agree, most cities like Soria, Zaragoza or even Huesca are really important. Without saying in more Vitoria-Gasteiz, Burgos, Santander, Valladolid etc that are really important and can come next. After if you want a Spain with just 6 cities, it's your problem. Many cities = great map
Erm sure, if with "important" you mean that they are populated or they are "famous", sure. Again, all cities cant be included. And of course, i agree about Vitoria-Gastteiz, Burgos, etc but im talking about the ones from that list. If we start including all "minor" cities it will be endless.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 04 May 2019 23:06
by joseantonio
Burgos is very important because when they put Madrid in Burgos you have to pass yes or yes or make it fictitious as the city of Girona.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 06:03
by EdgeGladiator
tantalus wrote:
04 May 2019 22:59
EdgeGladiator wrote:
03 May 2019 21:49
I don't agree, most cities like Soria, Zaragoza or even Huesca are really important. Without saying in more Vitoria-Gasteiz, Burgos, Santander, Valladolid etc that are really important and can come next. After if you want a Spain with just 6 cities, it's your problem. Many cities = great map
Erm sure, if with "important" you mean that they are populated or they are "famous", sure. Again, all cities cant be included. And of course, i agree about Vitoria-Gastteiz, Burgos, etc but im talking about the ones from that list. If we start including all "minor" cities it will be endless.
You speak about Jaca, La Jonquera, Manresa etc... ? These cities are already included. I don't think that included minor cities will slow down the project.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 09:52
by Plum™
Yep, otherwise cities would be so dense.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 11:12
by EdgeGladiator
It's better when it's so dense, I do not want an empty country

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 11:41
by Mooner_37
I like the density of cities and towns the developers of this project have already created :)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 12:33
by Plum™
Yeah but like 'over dense' where there is like only 100m of road between cities

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 13:08
by EdgeGladiator
100m is a little exaggerated, anyway I prefer it rather than 600 km between each city

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 13:24
by Plum™
Yeah I agree, this is not just in Spain but all countries

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 05 May 2019 15:49
by PirriAND
I was just wondering the other day, it's going to take a lot of balls and effort to make Gibraltar since it's not just a piece of flat land but rather a huge "rock" and to make the shape look very similar can take a lot of time and skills.

Especially the tunnel under the rock