Page 120 of 138

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 30 Jun 2019 16:55
by zmaj_od_istre
Is there a plan to recreate Mont Blanc tunnel?

As the current tunnel, is still generic that it could be any other tunnel in Europe-... and SCS missed it for some reason (which is weird as both DLCs are out)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 22 Jul 2019 15:20
by Mar333
what I'd like to see in the future, I think other Italians in here will agree with me...
Image

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 22 Jul 2019 15:41
by Lars014
In my opinion mostly of your roads can’t be build because of space issues only a bit of Ravenna could be possible but it would be very hard....

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 22 Jul 2019 16:13
by ShadowBlazer01
I think that Ravenna could be added. I still have to analyze some areas to determine if Aosta, Foggia, Trento, Bolzano and Brescia could be added, as well as Campobasso

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 22 Jul 2019 21:43
by Kaperios
Due to scale SS16 would be impossible to do, so is (probably) the southern tip of SS3 after Terni and I'm pretty sure SS309 wouldn't be possible/worth it either. SS309 could be possible, if it originated from Venezia. Also, Ferrara could fit in there but only if you gave up on SS309 so it's either that or that. The only things that would 100% fit would be SS16, most of SS3 and Ferrara.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 22 Jul 2019 21:45
by CptCaribbean
SS309 and SS3 could fit but SS16 I also think it wouldn't fit. Only a detour from the A14 directly to Ravenna.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 23 Jul 2019 16:47
by ScuL
As a personal preference I would like San Marino ... but that is also hard to achieve

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 23 Jul 2019 17:06
by Mar333
CptCaribbean wrote:
22 Jul 2019 21:45
SS309 and SS3 could fit but SS16 I also think it wouldn't fit. Only a detour from the A14 directly to Ravenna.
i agree, thinking about it, we can also do without the ss16...

I correct myself regarding the ss3, the correct name is ss3bis, it starts from Ravenna and ends in Terni

here the map updated with Perugia... it would be nice to have San Marino too

Image

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 24 Jul 2019 15:07
by lelux
Nice idea! SS3bis is a really important 4 lanes road and passes trough beautiful landscapes. Perugia also is an important node with almost 170000 inhabitants and a lot of factories! Even Terni i think needs a little bit of Promods touch!

Re: Development on version 2.x (Italy Edition)

Posted: 24 Jul 2019 22:35
by id777
ScuL wrote:
23 Jul 2019 16:47
As a personal preference I would like San Marino ... but that is also hard to achieve
Agree about San Marino, if developers can build it.